The search for alternative protein sources in feedstuffs, is a field of research that is gaining considerable attention. For example, soy bean meal (SBM) and fish meal are easily digestible and have traditionally been the main sources of proteins in poultry diets. However, this is likely going to change in the future. The world population is growing and the demand for animal products is increasing, but at the same time, prices for these protein meals are volatile. Moreover, their accessibility is expected to decline with an increasing demand for more highly digestible diet ingredients to be used for human consumption rather than for inclusion in animal diets.
The drive to continuously improve poultry production in a way that is both profitable and sustainable, will therefore fuel the evaluation of other protein sources that are more economical. However, these alternatives are likely to be less digestible, which will have a negative impact on animal performance. Especially young animals are prone to suffer from intestinal disorders an growth retardation when the maturation and function of their gastro-intestinal tract is hampered by digestive challenges. Not only will their lower digestibility result in reduced ileal uptake of amino acids, but also in more proteins reaching the hindgut. There, they will be used as a substrate for proteolytic fermentation, which can result in the production of harmful compounds that will compromise intestinal integrity and function throughout the broiler's entire growth period.
To explore the effects of less digestible protein sources on broiler production in the starter and grower phase of broilers and to evaluate the potential of different feeding strategies to mitigate their negative impact on performance, several studies were set up at Wageningen University. In one particular study (Qaisrani et al., 2015) an experiment was set up in which birds were fed a poorly digestible diet based on rapeseed meal (RSM). The impact of the following interventions was then evaluated: diet structure (coarse or fine), fermentable energy level (high or low) and supplementation of a coated butyrate product (2 kg/T ADIMIX®Precision, Nutriad).
The choice for the latter treatment had to do with the fact that butyrate is described to have multifarious benefits associated with improved intestinal health and function, which are dependent on the specific location of butyrate release in the digestive tract of the animal (Moquet et al., 2016). The butyrate product used in this study is characterized by a precision delivery functionality, meaning that butyrate will be delivered throughout the entire gastro-intestinal tract.
A positive outcome was also observed when the diet was coarser, such as an increased gizzard size and function, which is associated with a decrease in pH, a longer feed retention time in the foregut and an enhanced ileal protein digestibility; some of these effects were further enhanced when this strategy was combined with ADIMIX®Precision supplementation (Qaisrani et al., 2015).
In conclusion, the negative effects of a strong feed challenge could be partly counterbalanced already in the young animal by the supplementation of ADIMIX®Precision. The precision delivery butyrate release of this product is reflected by the gut health improving effects along the entire gastro-intestinal tract. This resulted in improved performance of broilers throughout their life.
For more of the article, please click here.
Article made possible through the contribution of Dr. Tim Goossens and Nutriad