Poultry
xClose

Loading ...
Swine
xClose

Loading ...
Dairy & Ruminant
xClose

Loading ...
Aquaculture
xClose

Loading ...
Feed
xClose

Loading ...
Animal Health
xClose

Loading ...
Livestock Production
Friday, July 27, 2012 7:41:45 PM
Print this articleForward this article

   
Comparison of five methods for genomic breeding value estimation for the common dataset of the 15th QTL-MAS Workshop

 
Chong-Long Wang, Pei-Pei Ma, Zhe Zhang, Xiang-Dong Ding, Jian-Feng Liu, Wei-Xuan Fu, Zi-Qing Weng and Qin Zhang
  
 
Background


Genomic breeding value estimation is the key step in genomic selection. Among many approaches, BLUP methods and Bayesian methods are most commonly used for estimating genomic breeding values. Here, we applied two BLUP methods, TABLUP and GBLUP, and three Bayesian methods, BayesA, BayesB and BayesCÏ€, to the common dataset provided by the 15th QTL-MAS Workshop to evaluate and compare their predictive performances.


Results


For the 1000 progenies without phenotypic values, the correlations between GEBVs by different methods ranged from 0.812 (GBLUP and BayesCÏ€) to 0.997 (TABLUP and BayesB). The accuracies of GEBVs (measured as correlations between true breeding values (TBVs) and GEBVs) were from 0.774 (GBLUP) to 0.938 (BayesCÏ€) and the biases of GEBVs (measure as regressions of TBVs on GEBVs) were from 1.033 (TABLUP) to 1.648 (GBLUP). The three Bayesian methods and TABLUP had similar accuracy and bias.


Conclusion


BayesA, BayesB, BayesCÏ€ and TABLUP performed similarly and satisfactorily and remarkably outperformed GBLUP for genomic breeding value estimation in this dataset. TABLUP is a promising method for genomic breeding value estimation because of its easy computation of reliabilities of GEBVs and its easy extension to real life conditions such as multiple traits and consideration of individuals without genotypes.

  
   
For more of the article, please click here.
   
Article made possible through the contribution of Chong-Long Wang, Pei-Pei Ma, Zhe Zhang, Xiang-Dong Ding, Jian-Feng Liu, Wei-Xuan Fu, Zi-Qing Weng, Qin Zhang and BioMed Central.
Share this article on FacebookShare this article on TwitterPrint this articleForward this article
Previous
My eFeedLink last read