Only the highest quality feed enables animals to achieve optimal results
Moulds produce mycotoxins as a natural immune system. The presence of these mycotoxins may vary greatly since the development of moulds in the field (e.g. Fusarium spp.) or during storage (e.g. Penicillium, Aspergillus) depends on several factors. This makes it very difficult to estimate the exact extent of the damage caused. Therefore it is recommended to regularly sample the feed, both when fungal and/or mycotoxin contamination is expected and preventively.
In general, environmental conditions – heat, water, and insect damage – cause plant stress and predispose plants in the field to mycotoxin contamination. However, weather conditions are difficult to control and a thorough monitoring of the crop should be applied to prevent these moulds.
Because feedstuffs can be contaminated pre- or post-harvest, control of additional mould growth and mycotoxin formation is dependent on storage management. After harvest, temperature, moisture content, and insect activity remain the major factors influencing mycotoxin contamination of feed grains and foods. Storage conditions should be very well fine-tuned to avoid mould growth.
Adverse effects of mycotoxins
Intoxication with mycotoxins occurs by eating contaminated feed. Since mycotoxins are usually not degraded during digestion or temperature treatments, these compounds can accumulate to high doses in feed products, in this way forming a serious risk for and animals. Many symptoms are associated with mycotoxin intoxication (mycotoxicosis), most of which are well described in animals. Mycotoxicosis can occur at two levels: acute illness due to intake of high levels of mycotoxins and chronic illness due to regular low level intake of mycotoxins.
Because of the serious health risks, it is very important to monitor mycotoxin levels during the feed production chain. Monitoring involves a correct sampling method as well as an accurate detection technique.
Figure 1: Correct sampling of materials potentially contaminated with mycotoxins
Figure 2: The 3 required steps (preparation, incubation and reading) are combined in the Quantitox
The analysis is based on quantitative ELISA techniques (Enzyme-Linked Immuno Sorbent Assay) and is capable of quantifying the following 6 mycotoxins: fumonisin, DON, OTA, aflatoxin, ZEA and T-2 toxin. ELISA is an immunochemical reaction and is based on the specific binding between an antigen (e.g. mycotoxin) and an enzyme-labelled antibody (present in the Quantitox strip). Mycotoxins are detected through binding of the mycotoxins to the labelled antibodies. This means that they are chemically linked and create a colour after a few intermediate steps. The more of the substance to be detected (e.g. mycotoxin) was present, the more enzyme action, and the more colour is finally created. The colour is measured using an ELISA reader based on a spectrophotometric determination. This reader will pass a value to the Quantitox which will show a quantitative analysis of the amount of mycotoxin present. The Quantitox performs assays of both raw materials and complete animal feed. The only exception to this are silages. Their low pH affects the assay process.
Interpretation of results
In the EU and elsewhere, guidelines have been set on maximum allowable mycotoxin content in feed and feed materials. In practice however, problems of mycotoxicosis often already occur below these guidelines. There are several plausible explanations for this. On the one hand, a mycotoxin is rarely present on its own and, moreover, a combination of different mycotoxins can have a synergistic effect. On the other hand, plants are capable of rapidly modifying some mycotoxins. These modified (masked) mycotoxins often escape assays but are converted into harmful precursors again in the animal. Finally, the effect of a mycotoxin will depend very much on the general immunity and stress level of the animal. All these causes together result in the practical maximum values being 2 to 5 times lower than the official guidelines, depending on the toxin and animal species (see Table 1).
Three fold strategy
Therefore action needs to be taken when mycotoxins are demonstrated or fungi are present in the feed. Removal of the contaminated feed is often not the most economical solution. The qualitative and quantitative determination of the mycotoxin contamination level enables to choose the optimum Vitafix toxin binder and its optimal dosage. A good mycotoxin toxin eliminator combines three strategies for countering the mycotoxins. Activated and purified aluminosilicates should ensure a wide adsorbing range leaving essential nutrients unaffected. Since not all mycotoxins can be bound, also a biotransformation strategy is needed to transform these mycotoxins into harmless metabolites. Finally the use of supporting agents like betain and natural antioxidants can help reducing the negative effects of mycotoxins and promote recovery of affected organs.
Regularly monitoring feed and consequently dealing with mycotoxins results in healthy animals, leading to increased production results and therefore better economic results.
To download the article, please click here.
Article made possible through the contribution of Nuscience